Drucella Andersen Headquarters, Washington, D.C. September 29, 1993 (Phone: 202/358-4727) H. Keith Henry Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. (Phone: 804/864-6120) Hank Price Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. (Phone: 202/267-3447) RELEASE: 93-171 NASA, FAA CONSIDER REVISED WINDSHEAR PILOTING PROCEDURES NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are considering whether pilots should have formal training to interact with new aircraft instruments able to give advance warning of windshear -- sudden changes in wind speed and direction that can endanger aircraft during takeoff and landing. Training consideration comes after 7 years of windshear studies by NASA and the FAA. The joint effort included research on windshear hazards, flight tests of three new advance-warning sensors and studies of pilot response to displays generated by data from the devices. The recommendations were reported at a NASA/FAA windshear meeting in Hampton, Va. "Forward-looking windshear sensors could be available to airlines by the end of this year," said Rosa Oseguera of NASA's Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. "We believe the most effective use of the sensors requires an industry standard on displays, a consensus on proper crew procedures for reacting to the information and training to put those procedures into effect." Windshear was a factor in air accidents that caused at least 500 deaths from 1964 to 1985. In 1987, the FAA created training aids to help pilots identify the phenomenon and escape if they unexpectedly enter a windshear. -more- -2- Oseguera and NASA engineer David Hinton outlined NASA's suggested displays and pilot actions for use by the FAA, aircraft manufacturers and air carriers. Because the new sensors can give up to 40 seconds warning of a windshear encounter, the procedures consider how far away the windshear is and where it is in relation to the plane's flight path. If the displays show a windshear more than 3 miles away or to the side of the flight path during the approach to the runway, for example, pilots would normally fly around the threat. If a windshear is on the flight path within 3 miles, pilots would either execute "missed approach" procedures or fly around it after clearance from air traffic controllers. A warning of windshear less than 1.5 miles ahead would dictate a straight-ahead escape, since there might not be enough time to contact controllers, get clearance and turn away from the hazard. The new sensors make this procedure possible because transport aircraft normally have power to fly through windshear if the pilots know about the hazard in advance and take appropriate actions. Similar rules would apply to windshear spotted during takeoff, but the distance guidelines are somewhat different. "Training based on use of the new sensors would let pilots evade windshears when possible, but also would make sure they can fly through them safely if contact can't be avoided," said Herbert Schlickenmaier, Program Manager at NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. "These procedures would expand on, not replace, current FAA-mandated techniques for avoiding windshear." NASA and the FAA began the joint windshear research program in 1986 to reduce the hazard to transport-type aircraft during takeoff and approach. A NASA Boeing 737 successfully flight-tested three types of forward-looking sensors in 1991 and 1992: microwave radar, Doppler LIDAR (laser radar) and infrared. "There are a number of tools available to reduce the hazard from the windshear threat. The ability to detect, locate and quantify this threat and relate it to aircraft performance capability, which these latest devices provide, is a tribute to all the participants in this program," said George C. "Cliff" Hay, FAA airborne windshear program manager. These instruments are "predictive" sensors, in contrast to "reactive" sensors that alert pilots only after a plane enters a windshear. FAA regulations say that reactive systems must be installed by most U.S. airlines by the end of 1993. Continental, Northwest and American Airlines asked for and got exemptions that would let them put predictive sensors in their aircraft by 1995. - end -